Responding in Chinese
I need to respond to the user's statement about football goal contributions in Chinese. It seems they mentioned a ranking: Haaland first, Mbappe second, and Kane third. The user might be looking for more context, stats, or confirmation. I consider acknowledging their point and might ask a clarifying question like, [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;Which season? Does the participation count include goals and assists?[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; I’ll keep it concise and avoid heavy formatting while providing relevant insights or asking if they want detailed stats.Crafting a concise response
I need to respect the guidelines for a concise and friendly tone. I’ll craft an affirmation in Chinese that discusses goal contributions: [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;是的，按五大联赛参与进球（进球+助攻），通常这三人领跑。[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; I’ll highlight key differences: Haaland's high scoring efficiency in the Premier League, Mbappe's balanced playstyle, and Kane's dual role in both scoring and assisting. I'll ask, [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;你是想看本赛季至今的精确数据和走势图，还是近三季对比？[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; It's essential to avoid fabricating stats, focusing instead on general analysis.
说得对，这三人本季/近两季在五大联赛里几乎一直领跑参与进球（进球+助攻）。简单点看：
- 哈兰德：禁区终结极致，曼城机会创造稳定，进球占比高；助攻不多但效率恐怖
- 姆巴佩：既能无球冲刺也能持球制造机会，进球与造机会更均衡
- 凯恩：进球稳定且策应组织强，助攻数往往不低（在热刺/拜仁都体现）
\n
小提醒：
- 口径要统一：只算联赛还是含所有赛事；“参与进球”是否含造点
- 截止日期不同排名可能有细微变动
\n
需要我给出“本赛季截至某日期”的精确进球+助攻数据和简表吗？告诉我赛季和截止到哪一天，我就按同一口径列给你并做个简短对比。